Contact us!
Find Us On Facebook

Free Ground Shipping

Pay by VISA, Mastercard, Discover, AMEX, Paypal or Bank Transfer

AMD Solution Provider
NVIDIA Partnerforce Program Member

Is Tape Dead? A Review of Backup Technology

Original Article Date: 2007-06-26

In this issue, I'd like to briefly talk about one of those trends that has been spearheaded by the consumer, instead the usual push from major electronics vendors, and that's the changing face of data backup.

Why Tape Has Historically Dominated Backup

Talk to any systems administrator over the last 20 years about backup of valuable data, and you'll hear one key word, tape. Evolving over many years, tape has been the standard method for providing essential backup of local and network-based storage. Its purpose has been protecting data against disasters such as fire, theft and hard disk failure, or user-based errors such as overwriting or deleting needed files.

Tape filled this role principally because a unit of storage (KB/MB/GB) on tape used to be significantly cheaper than the equivalent amount of storage on a hard disk. Tape drives have never been particularly cheap, but the combined cost of a drive and a set of backup tapes would be much less than the same number of equivalent capacity hard drives.

A further factor in tape's dominance was the relative stability and durability of the medium, especially when compared with IDE/ATA disks that typically did not inspire confidence among IT staff if they were to consider backing up valuable data to them.

In recent years, however, ATA disks (in the guise of the current Serial ATA standard), have improved in terms of reliability, whilst at the same time, plummetting in cost per GB. The price advantage of a tape drive and set of backup tapes versus the equivalent number of hard drives as backup has not only been reduced, but has actually disappeared altogether. As I will demonstrate later, it is now significantly cheaper to backup your data to a revolving system of removeable hard drives than to use a conventional tape drive and tape-set system.

Alternatives to Tape for Backup - Old and New

Tape hasn't been the only means of protecting your data against loss. In the last two decades, a number of alternatives to tape have come and gone: 

  • Floppy Drives - Once the standard for PC backup, their tiny 1.44MB capacity has become largely useless for modern file systems. The Iomega ZIP drive proved to be a popular enhancement to the floppy format, but now even these drives have been made largely obsolete for personal backup by CD/DVD writeable media.
  • Optical Media - In one form or another, removeable optical media has been around as a method for backup since the mid 1980s, from the original WORM drives, various formats of Magneto-Optical (MO) cartridges, and most recently writeable CDs and DVDs. For non-networked, PC file backup, rewriteable CDs/DVDs are the most popular choice, owing to the very low cost of both media and drives, and relatively simple backup and restore operations. For comprehensive and structured corporate backup systems, however, the relatively limited capacity of CDs/DVDs (currently 9GB for Dual-Layer DVD) does not make them suitable. Furthermore, the future of optical media is unlikely to change this, as it seems optical technology is unable to keep pace with the growth in storage used by corporate computing (e.g. Blu-ray disks are at most 50GB, still smaller than the smallest mainstream hard disk at 80GB).
  • Internet - A relatively recent trend, off-site storage via internet broadband connection has emerged as a means for individuals and small businesses to easily protect their data from worst-case site based scenarios such as fire, flood and theft. In these situations, it is possible that the backup store could be destroyed along with the original store, thus invalidating any local backup strategy. By using online drive services such as Xdrive and iBackup, one can purchase 5GB or more of a drive somewhere away from your home or office, and backup your valued data onto it, thus insuring against local catastrophes. Downsides, however, can be slow transfer times, and concern about some unscrupulous employee of the drive service decrypting and looking at your sensitive files.
  • Network Drive Storage - Grouping together on-line or near-line hard-disk storage in this category, network drive storage is popular amongst medium to large corporate IT departments because of its high availability and speed. A recent trend spearheaded by Buffalo has also brought this concept to many homes and small businesses, through their mini-NAS solutions. An explosive growth in single USB external hard drives has also meant that many home users are now backing up their data to these drives instead of DVD. The downside to these, however, is that they can be expensive, and are as equally vulnerable to fire, flood and theft as your original store, so they only really protect you from disk failure or user-error.
  • Removeable Hard Drives - An increasingly popular trend amongst small to medium sized businesses, this method of effectively substituting tapes with hard drives bolted to hotswap drive carriers. With massive capacity, portability and low cost driving this solution, removeable hard drives could be the Tape Killer many have predicted. As I'll reveal below, building a backup infrastructure using removeable hard drives in place of tape is now the cheaper option.

Are Removeable Hard Drives set to become the Tape Killer?

Removeable Hard Drives are a substitute for Tape Backup. I was alerted to this trend by a number of my customers who had begun improvising in this area.

Like in a tape backup system, you would do nightly backups onto 5-7 different hard drives which can be loaded into and out of a hotswap hard drive enclosure mounted in a standard 5.25" drive bay (see typical photo opposite). At the end of each week, you would then take one of the drives out of the daily rotation of drives to keep as a weekly snapshot, and the same again at the end of each month.

So a removeable hard drive backup system would typically require between 7 and 10 drives, depending on how many days a week you perform a backup, and over what intervals you set aside additional backups. Each of these drives would require a mounting frame into which it would be securely inserted, but the system would require only one hotswap bay, mounted in one of the server or workstation's 5.25" drive bays.

Just like in tape, you would store the removeable drives in a secure location, such as a safe, or off-site, such as the system administrator's home office.

But how do the costs and other aspects of removeable hard drives compare with tape?

Consider this scenario. A small business has a server running a website, MS Exchange, network file storage and a contacts database. Their typical storage usage does not exceed 200GB. The data stored on the serve is invaluable, the loss of which could result in serious hardship for the business. So they need a backup strategy.

Traditionally, the only viable option for secure, rapid and relatively inexpensive backup that can match their requirements was tape. But let's now consider removeable hard drives as a rival option. Here is the outlay needed for both tape and removeable hard drive systems that would fit their needs:

TAPE
1 x Sony SDX-570V AIT-2 Tape Drive (80GB native, 208GB compressed) - $948.00
7 x AIT-2 Tapes (5 daily, 1 weekly, 1 monthly) - $300.00
Total cost: $1,248.00

REMOVEABLE HDD
1 x 2/4 port SATA disk controller that supports hotswap - $200.00
8 x WD2500KS 250GB 7,200rpm SATA HDD (5 daily, 1 weekly, 1 monthly, 1 spare) - $640.00
7 x 5.25" Hotswap caddy and enclosures for HDDs (only one enclosure used) - $210.00.
Total cost: $1,050.00

So on cost grounds, one can see that a system of removeable hard disks in place of tape is the cheaper option. Hard Drives do have the disadvantage of being somewhat more fragile than tapes - you can't throw them around or drop them on the floor like tapes, for instance. But on the plus side, hard drives allow rapid random access to their contents for file recovery, whereas tapes are notorious for being a serial medium, requiring often lengthy rewinds and fast-forwards when retrieving data.

With the downward trend in hard drive storage pricing continuing at a faster pace than any corresponding drops in tape backup pricing, the cost advantages to removeable hard drive storage are set to increase. Additionally, the trend in squeezing more and more data onto the same area of a hard disk-platter continues at a much more rapid pace than that of tape. And for these two reasons above any other, I believe that removeable hard drives will continue to grow as means of corporate data backup, and will ultimately become the tape killer.

Ben Ranson
Chief Systems Engineer